|
Une analyse de Robert Mbelo, Spécialiste des questions occultes de Relations Politiques Internationales sur la Succession papale
26 Oct 2003
L'église Catholique romaine s'est toujours sevrée aux mamelles du pouvoir. C'est elle, depuis des lustres, qui sacrait des rois et princes de ce monde, les mariait et ordonnait leurs oraisons funèbres. Mais l'Eglise n'est pas que cela; elle a ses rates et compromissions dans l'histoire: souvenez-vous des inquisitions, de la guerre des croisées, du soutien de l'Eglise de Rome au IIIe Reich Nazi, la protection des anciens collabos nazi etc...
Mais elle avait refusé d'accorder asile a Manuel Noriega... qui a été livré aux Américains. Les relations entre les USA et le Vatican sont intimement politiques; à savoir que le Vatican joue le rôle de supplétif a la politique américaine. Partout ou l'Amérique a échoué, on a vu arriver le pape.
Au Mexique, ou les Etats-unis (CIA) sont en difficulté avec les rebelles du Chiapas, le pape y était allé pour dire: "Je suis le messager de la paix": de quelle paix ? Aujourd'hui encore les Indiens du Chiapas continuent de vivre dans la précarité et des privations de toutes sortes.
Au Nicaragua, le Pape a fustigé la «Théologie de la Libération» ou «Option pour les Pauvres» dite très proche de la gauche (marxiste) et s'en est pri publiquement et ouvertement au prêtres Sandinistes qui ont soutenu le régime de Sandinista et son mouvement le «National Liberation Front (FSLN)», qui a mi fin à la dictature militaire de Somoza, soutenue par les USA - comme celle de Mobutu l'a été au Congo pendant 37 ans!. Il a pointé son doigt devant tous cameras du monde au père Ernesto Cardenal, ministre de l'Éducation du Nicaragua lors de la Révolution sandiniste, lui administrant des mises en garde très sévères!.Hélas! Partout sur l'esplanade ou le Pape devait célébrer la messe à Managua (capitale du Nicaragua), se trouvaient partout hissés les photos de Sandinista.
A Boston (USA) il avait critiqué le capitalisme pour faire croire aux pauvres qu'il était de leur cote; or que c'est de la poudre aux yeux.
Lors de l'agression américaine en Serbie, on l'a vu encore faire une visite en Roumanie, pays de confession orthodoxe, en vue de couper des soutiens qu'elle accordait à Milosevic, qui se cachait en Roumanie au moment des bombardements américains. Ces quelques exemples nous démontrent a suffisance comment le Vatican est inféodé a la politique américaine.
D'autre part, toutes les transactions financières américaines occulte passent par la" Banco Sanctus Spiritus" du Vatican. C'est la raison pour laquelle la CIA avait exige que ce soit un Américain qui soit nomme Ministre des Finances du Vatican; ce fut le cas du Cardinal Marchincus... Vous vous souviendrez qu'il fut ministre à l'époque de la guerre Iran Irak, à l'époque de l'Irangate, le scandale qui allait éclabousser la Maison Blanche a l'époque. Il s'agissait de la vente d'arme américaine à l'Iran par l'administration Reagan, alors que les Etats-Unis étaient supposés soutenir l'Irak contre l'Iran. Mais ce deux pays étaient manipules; car officiellement, les Etats-Unis fournissaient les armes à l'Irak, mais dans les coulisses, ils livraient des armes à l'Iran, armes qui transitaient par Israël, et toutes les transactions financières passaient par la Banco Sanctus Spiritus du Vatican.
Le Directeur de sa filiale, la "Banco Ambrosino" qui avait voulu poser trop de question sur ces transferts occultes a été tout simplement pendu haut et court sous un pont de la Tamise à Londres. Les autres suivirent leur descente en enfer: Lucio Gelli, membre de la loge PII, avant lui, Aldo Morro, ancien chef du Parti Démocratie Chrétienne italienne. Tous emportes en en enfer avec la bénédiction du Vatican et qu'en dire de la mort du Pape Jean-Paul Ier ?...
Ceci étant, les élections papales constituent un tournant pour l'ensemble de la politique mondiale. Il n'est point secret pour personne que le choix de l'actuel Pape en 1979 était mu par la volonté des Etats-Unis de commencer la destruction du bloc communiste qui continuait à l'époque le rempart contre leur politique de domination dans le monde. La suite on la connaît, le mur est tombe... qu'est-ce-qui a change dans nos vies, nous peuples opprimes ?
Mais certains d'entre- nous aveugles politiques et spirituels voient par exemple en l'avènement du téléphone portable un succès et un progrès, sans savoir qu'avec ce gadget, ils sont tous fiches par ceux qui dominent et gouvernent le monde actuel. Ils peuvent vous atteindre à tout moment. Souvenez-vous comment le dirigeant Cheychene des années 1998-2000 avait été repère et abattu, souvenez-vous de l'assassinat de Savimbi...
Aujourd'hui, bien que la forteresse communiste est tombée, il n'en reste pas mois que les Etats-Unis se butent a deux autre remparts contre leur politique de domination et d'hégémonisme dans le monde:
1. Le monde arabe et islamique: On voit tout les jours qui passent comment les Etats-Unis sont en train de s'enliser dans cette partie du monde; Palestine, Irak, Afghanistan...Ce qui empêche la domination américaine dans cette partie du monde, c'est la force culturelle de la religion musulmane. C'est en s'appuyant sur leur foi en l'Islam que les arabes et les musulmans résistent contre les assauts agressifs du monde occidental, les Etats-Unis et Israël en tête.
C'est cette résistance contre les forces d'occupation de leurs territoires en Palestine, en Afghanistan et en Irak qui est qualifiée de "TERRORIME". Malheureusement, je vois que la plupart d'intellectuels dont beaucoup me lisent ici, ne savent pas qu'Israël opère sur des territoires palestiniens et que les Palestiniens sont dans leurs droits légitimes de se défendre contre l'occupant et le colonisateur israélien. Il en est de même pour les Afghans et les Irakiens.
C'est sur ce dernier terrain que la direction des opérations clandestines de la CIA s'était trompee des paramètres; ce qui a induit l'Administration américaine en erreur, et, les multinationales, le complexe militaro-industriel ainsi que les lobbies financiers du Wall street, de Londres et de HongKong se posent des questions sur leur engagement en Irak... jusqu'ici, ils n'ont pas encore récupère la mise qu'ils avaient investi dans cette guerre coloniale en Irak... et se demandent qui va les indemniser en cas d'enlisement de la "coalition"sur les terres maudites de Babylone ???!!! Bush est dans des beaux draps. C'est très dangereux; souvenez-vous du sort de Kennedy...lorsqu'il s'étaitfrotte aux forces occultes du complexe militaro-industriel...
2.Le monde asiatique: Le poids de la Chine pèse lourd et empêche les Etats-Unis de la conquérir compte tenu de sa population, qui va atteindre 2 milliards d'âme d'ici 2005-2010. D'autre part le cas de la Corée du Nord et son programme nucléaire inquiète les Américains. Et comment venir à bout de la Chine et de la Corée du Nord qui menace d'utiliser l'arme nucléaire en cas d'agression américaine.
Ce sont les deux équations qu'ils tenteront de resourdre dans les ordres silencieux, occulte et mystiques de l'OPUS DEI du Vatican, en faisant élire un pape qui fédérera les esprits surchauffes des pays du sud et du monde opprime par les Etats-Unis.
On avait pense, vers les années 1998 -2000 a un pape noir africain et le nom du Cardinal Gatin du Benin circulait sous les soutanes rouges pourpres des princes de l'Eglise Catholique Romaine et dans les enceintes closes de la directions des opérations clandestine de la CIA. Mais cette option avait été abandonnée depuis a cause de la nouvelle donne en Irak du fait que le monde noir africain ne constitue pas un danger contre la politique colonisatrice des Etats-Unis; puisque sans culture politique ni religieuse, le peuple noir, habitué a trahir, est facile a manipuler…
Actuellement, la santé du Pape est fragile et sa vie touche à sa fin. Il faut donc le remplacer par un autre qui épousera les velléités dominatrice de la politique américaine... et ils (CIA) l'ont trouvé. D'ici quelques jour, une fumée de couleur blanche jaillira de la haute cheminée vaticane, et l'on dira: "HABEMUS CHIN-TOCK"!!!, un Pape chinois est né...
Arch-Conservative German Elected Pope
By Philip Pullella and Crispian Balmer
Reuters
Tuesday 19 April 2005
Vatican City - Arch-conservative German cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was elected Pope on Tuesday in a surprise choice that delighted traditionalist Roman Catholics but stunned moderates hoping for a more liberal papacy.
Ratzinger, 78, the Church's 265th pontiff, will take the name of Benedict XVI. He is expected to defend Pope John Paul's strict orthodox legacy and reject changes in Catholic doctrine. He is the oldest man to be elected pope for three centuries and the first German pontiff for a millennium.
The speed of the election, on only the second day of a secret cardinals conclave, and its result were both a surprise. Many Vatican experts had said Ratzinger, John Paul's tough doctrinal watchdog for 23 years, was too divisive and too old to become pope. They had predicted he would have to cede to a more conciliatory compromise figure during the conclave, although John Paul had appointed all but two of the cardinal electors and one of those two was Ratzinger himself.
The white-haired new Pope appeared on the balcony of St Peter's Basilica soon after his election, smiling broadly and greeting tens of thousands of cheering faithful.
"I entrust myself to your prayers," he said as the crowd chanted "Papa! Papa! Papa!" and waved umbrellas and flags. Some climbed lamp posts and fountains in the cobblestone square for a better view. Benedict was showered with congratulations from foreign and religious leaders but the election was greeted with consternation by those hoping for a relaxation in John Paul's strict rule over the world's 1.1 billion Catholics.
"We consider the election of Ratzinger is a catastrophe ... We can expect no reform from him in coming years ... I think even more people will turn their back on the Church," said Bernd Goehring, of the German ecumenical group Kirche von Unten.Even in St Peter's Square, some of the celebrations were tempered by fear of widening divisions in the Church.
"It's a historic moment, but a very sad one. He is even more conservative than John Paul II. All he knows to do is condemn, condemn, condemn," said Agusti Capdevila from Barcelona. Benedict's election by a conclave meeting in the Vatican's frescoed Sistine Chapel was signaled by white smoke from the chapel chimney and the tolling of the bells of St. Peter's.
New Pope Dominated Vatican after John Paul's Death
The election indicated both that the cardinals wanted to maintain John Paul's strict Church orthodoxy and also to have a short, transitional papacy after the Polish pope's 26-year reign -- the third longest in Church history.
"I was surprised for a couple of reasons. One is his age ... The second is that I thought he might have been too much of a polarising person. But that may not be the perception that was shared by the cardinals," said Lawrence Cunningham, theology professor at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana.
Ratzinger, dean of the cardinals, had dominated the Vatican since the death of Pope John Paul on April 2. He presided over the funeral Mass and daily meetings of cardinals since then.
He used a homily at a Mass before the conclave to issue a stern warning that godless modern trends must be rejected. The address was widely seen as promoting his candidacy.
He was expected to take a tough line against reformist trends in Europe and North America. In a Good Friday Mass this year he said: "How much filth there is in the Church, even among those who, in the priesthood, should belong entirely to Him."
Ratzinger's stern leadership of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, the modern successor to the Inquisition, delighted conservative Catholics but upset moderates and other Christians whose churches he described as deficient.
Before St. Peter's bells confirmed Benedict's election, there were 10 minutes of confusion over the color of the smoke, which initially seemed grey. But even before the bells pealed, thousands of faithful in the square cheered and applauded, yelling "A pope, a pope!" It was only the third time in a century that a pope had been chosen on the second day of a conclave. The new Pope had to win a two-thirds majority of the 115 red-robed cardinals.
New Pope Tough Disciplinarian
In Germany, church bells rang out and Catholics streamed into churches to celebrate Benedict's election. The choice of Ratzinger dashed hopes of a pope from the developing world, where two thirds of Catholics now live. He is expected to pay particular attention to the decline of faith and spread of secularism in Europe.
As John Paul's doctrinal overseer, Ratzinger disciplined Latin American "liberation theology" theologians, denounced homosexuality and gay marriage and pressured Asian priests who saw non-Christian religions as part of God's plan for humanity.
Matt Foreman, of the U.S. National Gay and Lesbian Task Force said: "Today the princes of the Roman Catholic Church elected as Pope a man whose record has been one of unrelenting, venomous hatred for gay people."
In a document in 2000, Ratzinger branded other Christian churches as deficient -- shocking Anglicans, Lutherans and other Protestants in ecumenical dialogue with Rome for years. Ratzinger was the oldest cardinal to be named pope since Clement XII, who was also 78 when he became pope in 1730. He is the first German pope since Victor II (1055-1057).
Before the conclave door shut on Monday, Ratzinger made a final appeal to his fellow electors to protect traditional teachings and to shun modern trends. He made no mention of the challenges that other cardinals and ordinary Catholics say should top the agenda such as poverty, Islam, science, sexual morality and Church reform.
Born in Bavaria on April 16, 1927, the son of a police chief, he served in the Hitler Youth during World War II when membership was compulsory, according to his autobiography. But he was never a member of the Nazi party and his family opposed Adolf Hitler's regime, biographers have said. Ratzinger later became a leading theology professor and then archbishop of Munich before taking over the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1981.
Hitler Youth and the Vatican
By Marc Ash
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Thursday 28 April 2005
In the final stages of World War II, US and British soldiers reported that the German military was using child soldiers. Boys as young as 14 faced advancing allied forces, often fighting to the death. Death, however, was not always the fate that awaited the young Germans, some were captured. The American and English soldiers who questioned the young prisoners noted two things almost categorically: most of the child soldiers were or had been Hitler Youth, and those who had held membership in the Fuhrer's youth corps were impossible to reason with. Passionate ideological mind-sets were reportedly common among these boys.
Recent worldwide press attention to the boyhood membership of now-Pope Benedict XVI in the Hitler Youth Movement has re-focused the attention of world on the origins of the catastrophic conflict that engulfed mankind in the mid-twentieth century. The debate has been focused in particular on what constituted a good German at that time.
In fairness to the new Pope, there is no evidence that any member of the Ratzinger family supported or sympathized with the Nazis. There are even some accounts that put the Ratzinger family in opposition to the Nazis. That would have, by any account of the day, been risky, as the Nazis were willing to mete out their vengeance against Catholics who opposed them as quickly as against any other opposition. Catholics who resisted faced persecution and even execution. As for entry into the Hitler Youth movement itself, as Cardinal Ratzinger has pointed out many times over the years, young German boys were in fact conscripted, and attendance was compulsory. History supports this all.
Two things, however, bear note. First, Cardinal Ratzinger's own recollection of induction into the Hitler Youth Movement. He said, "I was too young, but later was enrolled into it from the seminary." And second, it should be noted that, in Germany today, finding a former Nazi is not easy. Yes, there is a troubling cadre of new-right neo-Nazis. Gone, however, are the wild-eyed throngs of average Germans who were swayed, gone as though they had never existed.
Fear and Loathing of Communism
One theory promulgated by Adolph Hitler that has resonated with many Americans throughout the decades is the fear and loathing of Communism. It seems the red menace is as good a social motivator in America today as it was at the Nuremberg rally in 1934. Shame. Beware the left, and all that. At any rate, according to a recent New York Times article by Richard Bernstein, Daniel J. Wakin and Mark Landler, Joseph Ratzinger developed a deep and abiding disdain for the student radicalism in the late 1960s at Tübingen University. The Times authors point to a fear that students' tactics smacked of Nazi tactics, and that, they conclude, Ratzinger could not abide. But Ratzinger's words belie a greater fear of Marxism. He wrote, "Marxist revolution kindled the whole university with its fervor, shaking it to its very foundations." Some years later, he chided a left-leaning colleague over dinner, saying with some satisfaction, "Your Marxist revolution has come to nothing."
Events in Russia during the first half of the twentieth century sent shock waves through all of Europe. As the kettle boiled over in Moscow there was little time to differentiate between Marxism and Stalinism. The difference was profound but ultimately the far-left proved a catalyst for the far-right and the center became a killing-field. Stalin had used the far-left to launch his own personal Stalinist dictatorship and the rest is, as they say, history. While Stalin pretended to support the goals of the Communists to gain power, Hitler used fear of the Communists to do the same. It is also worthy of noting that as the far-right attempted to gain power in the US in recent Presidential elections the far-left, specifically Ralph Nader once again opened the door.
Joseph Ratzinger might have argued that the far left's capacity to empower the far right was reason enough to reject the new thinking emerging at Tübingen University in the late 1960s. But as his journey now has led him to be arguably the most influential man in the world, his early demonization of the students at Tübingen becomes suspect by its convenience.
Why Does All This Matter?
The Vatican contends today, as it has always contended, that they 'don't do politics.' History disagrees, particularly with regard to the Vatican's relationship with the Nazis. Serious allegations have swirled for years about the Vatican's complicity with the Nazis during and after the war. Those charges have resulted in several investigations and at least one lawsuit, but no more. The Vatican has refused repeated requests to open its archives from the period. Until they do so, the question remains open, as well it should.
Some facts from that period are not in dispute and do shed light. Pope Pius XII has long been criticized for his silence as the Nazi concentration camps did their awful work, but understanding Pius XII's relationship with the Nazis provides substantial insight into why he did not speak out. The 1933 Concordat signed by the Vatican with the Nazis ensured, if nothing else, that they would do no harm to one another. The Reich Concordat was an agreement signed between the Vatican and the National Socialist government of Germany. The person primarily responsible for the negotiation and signing of this document was the Cardinal Secretary of State, Eugenio Pacelli, the future Pope Pius XII, with the agreement of Pius XI. Why the Vatican saw fit to elevate Pacelli to Pope as Germany was massing its armies is a question that remains relevant today.
Among Joseph Ratzinger's better-published positions is "a sense that Catholicism is in competition with Islam." Is that very different from the Vatican's attitudes toward European Jews during the early part of the twentieth century? Lo and behold, armies march again, and once more, the Vatican and German Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger are at the center of the action. As the US pursues what the Islamic world views as a latter-day Christian crusade, it appears Ratzinger made the decision to intercede in the US presidential election process on behalf of the war's architect, George W. Bush. In a June 2004 letter to US bishops, Ratzinger made clear that John Kerry was a sinner for his positions on "life" issues, as would be any one who voted for him. The result was a historic swing of traditionally Democratic voters away from the Catholic John Kerry and into the win column for Republican George W. Bush.
While Pope John Paul II had openly opposed the US war on Iraq, Ratzinger had ensured it would continue for four more years. Either death by war is more acceptable to the Vatican than death by abortion or Islam is a bigger concern than they are letting on. Or both. By all accounts, the American and English soldiers in the trenches were right: the Hitler Youth were/are ideologically driven.
****New Pope Intervened against Kerry in US 2004 Election Campaign
Agence France-Presse, 19 April 2005
Washington - German Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Vatican theologian who was elected Pope Benedict XVI, intervened in the 2004 US election campaign ordering bishops to deny communion to abortion rights supporters including presidential candidate John Kerry.
In a June 2004 letter to US bishops enunciating principles of worthiness for communion recipients, Ratzinger specified that strong and open supporters of abortion should be denied the Catholic sacrament, for being guilty of a "grave sin."
He specifically mentioned "the case of a Catholic politician consistently campaigning and voting for permissive abortion and euthanasia laws," a reference widely understood to mean Democratic candidate Kerry, a Catholic who has defended abortion rights.
The letter said a priest confronted with such a person seeking communion "must refuse to distribute it."
A footnote to the letter also condemned any Catholic who votes specifically for a candidate because the candidate holds a pro-abortion position. Such a voter "would be guilty of formal cooperation in evil, and so unworthy to present himself for holy communion," the letter read.
The letter, which was revealed in the Italian magazine L'Espresso last year, was reportedly only sent to US Catholic bishops, who discussed it in their convocation in Denver, Colorado, in mid-June.
Sharply divided on the issue, the bishops decided to leave the decision on granting or denying communion to the individual priest. Kerry later received communion several times from sympathetic priests.
Nevertheless, in the November election, a majority of Catholic voters, who traditionally supported Democratic Party candidates, shifted their votes to Republican and eventual winner George W. Bush.
Back to top |
