PROFITS FOR THE WEST, RAPE, MASSACRES AND SLAVERY FOR THE REST:
HOW THE WESTERN HIGH-TECH MANIA IS FUELLING BOTH THE WAR AND THE
ILLEGAL EXPLOITATION OF NATURAL AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO
>An
investigation by Antoine Roger Lokongo, a London-based Congolese
journalist
28.07.2004
MULTINATIONAL MINING COMPANIES ARE STEALING CONGO'S PATRIMONY
Behind
the aggression by a Rwandan-Ugandan-Burundian coalition
- supported by well-known superpowers and facilitated by
Congolese rebel puppets - which the Democratic Republic
of Congo (DRC) has been subjected to since 1998, there is
an important stake for transnational mining companies and
corporations, as a report by a UN panel of experts on the
plundering and exploitation of Congo's mineral and natural
resources indicated. Mining resources in other countries
of the world have already been heavily exploited, not to
say exhausted, and those, which are being exploited, are
associated with tremendous costs.
The collapse of the Soviet Union has put an end to bipolarity
and this has favoured the rise to power of the multinational
corporations, whose expansion and global strategies today
can no longer be stymied, even by national governments themselves
who must ensure their investments. From now on multinational
mining companies are nurturing the ambition of creating
a new world order, as they operate free of any competition,
by proceeding to the creation of new state entities - by
dismantling the strictures of a former state or annihilating
it altogether and setting up in its stead a new state entity
operating as a simple subsidiary or a trivial post, which
will be their own replicas and will operate as one of their
own organs.
Africa
finds itself at the centre of these new planetary stakes.
With almost one third of the world raw materials, abandoned
by the former metropolitan powers, which have been disengaging
gradually, both from the point of view of cooperation and
of military assistance, African countries have become easy
prey of multinational corporations. Today no African leader
can dare put up some noticeable resistance against these
new masters of the world, I mean the powerful multinational
corporations, which through successive mega-mergers are
increasing their size as well as their powers to do harm
against trivialised populations. In fact, to better control
their capital investments, these multinational corporations
are imposing upon African populations political leaders
of their own choosing, who very often are badly known to
the people, and thus are destabilising the continent, and
giving through the hypocritically so-called pacification,
the opportunity to the UN armies to push on the throats
of the people de facto secessions, which they do not want.
UN armies can thus manage to create their own states within
the states.
The
size of the Democratic Republic of Congo (which is as big
as the whole of western Europe), its geological strategic
position in the heart of the African continent, the sharing
of its borders with nine (9) other countries, along with
its mineral resources, had destined it as first target and
the site of choice for the pursuit of this world strategy
in Africa.
Accordingly,
the great financiers of this world, hunters of mineral resources,
have their eyes targeted on Congo, once described by the
Belgian occupants as 'a geological scandal', where discovered
mineral deposits are still virgin or ill exploited and likely
to open markets to big capital gain investments.
That is why mining transnational corporations are fighting
over the most juicy bits and pieces in one or the other
part of Congo, and this in keeping with the political tendencies
or 'rebellions', which are associated with them and even
created by them. The attempt to appropriate to themselves
the Congo through war should allow these multinational corporations,
if victory chooses the camp of Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi,
which are fighting on their behalf, to take over the Congolese
mineral resources and use them for their interests.
Congo
has coltan (80% of the world's reserves), which is sought
after for the manufacture of mobile phones, laptops, CD-players,
camcorders, satellite, in fact everything high-tech. It
also has copper and cobalt reserves, which would be the
most important in the world for several years. It was the
first producer of these red metals, pumping 500,000 tons
a year into the market from 1978 onward. But in 1985, this
production dropped to 30,000 tons as a result the deterioration
of the mining infrastructures of the major mine of Kamoto
in Kolwezi, a section of which collapsed in 1990 while its
production represented 33% of Gecamines, Congo's giant mining
parastatal and a major supplier of foreign exchange for
Congio's public treasury; as well as the fall in copper
prices and the mismanagement of the state portfolio by successive
governments of the Mobutu regime.
In
1996, Kabila, a long-time opponent of Mobutu led a rebellion
backed by Rwanda and Uganda to overthrow Mobutu, taking
advantage of the geo-political changes in the region. The
replacement of Mobutu was approved by the United States
of America, determined to confine their old Cold War ally
into the dustbin of history. Transnational mining companies
were always hustling between the rebels and governmental
authorities in order to seize their shares, by making sure
that they were on the side of the winner and by forcing
destiny, if need be. In March 1997, as soon as Kisangani
fell to Kabila's Alliance Democratique pour la Liberation
du Congo-Zaire (ADFL), the leaders of American Mineral Fields
Inc., a metals giant multinational company listed on the
Toronto Stock Exchange (symbol -AMZ) as a junior mining
company set up their office in Goma to enter in contact
with the authorities of ADFL. AMZ was formed in 1995 to
develop Brazilian diamond interests and was operating from
Arkansas in the US, and subsequently shifted its focus to
the vast mineral opportunities in the former Zaire. The
contact was made thanks to a retired Belgian Colonel, Willy
Mallant, military advisor of ADFL and former military advisor
to Mobutu as well. AMZ succeded in taking over the bid for
the exploration of copper and cobalt in Tenke - Fungurume,
Katanga, a mining concession belonging to Gecamines, at
the expense of its competitor, South African mining company
Anglo American Corporation Zincor and Belgium's Union Minière
who was granted licences by the outgoing Mobutu regime to
extract and process copper and cobalt in Kasomba and Kolwezi.
But
according Pierre Baracyetse, a French mining civil engineer,
AMZ was at that time implicated and interested in the contract
for the construction of the orbital platform around the
world that is destined to replace the Russian Station, MIR
after its demise. It is a question of a $60 billion market,
which will end in 2004 with the launching of the last module.
Enterprises and industries from 60 countries are participating
in it. Special alloys, which enter into the composition
of numerous parts of this special engine require enormous
quantities of rare and precious metals, such as cobalt,
coltan (colombo-tantalite or niobium), tungsten or gold.
All these metals are found in the Congolese underground.
The
agreement between the AFDL and AMZ was described by Jean-Raymond
Boulle, AMZ's key shareholder as 'a new era lurking out
in the former Zaire'. 'There is a risk, but for us it is
logical,' Boulle said. The agreement consisted of a transfer
of Gecamines, the giant of Congolese economy to AMZ under
a form of privatisation.
It
dealt with three sites, including:
1.
A first project worth US$200 million in Kolwezi for the
extraction of copper and cobalt;
2. A second project worth $30 million for a plant for the
extraction of cobalt from copper residues in Kipushi; and
3. A third project for a zinc processing plant, requiring
more than US$550 million in investment in Kipushi.
The
mine of Kipushi is unique in that it contains a strong concentration
of the mineral on a small surface area, and that this mineral
is located, in addition, into an underground layer more
than 1,000 metres deep. Germanium and almost all the other
minerals associated with copper are extracted there, beside
copper itself and zinc.
Kabila
is also said by his detractors to have signed another agreement
with his Ugandan, Rwandan and Burundian backers, consisting
of a revision of the border drawings in favour of Rwanda,
Uganda, and Burundi as a price to be paid by Congo for the
aid given to him during the war of liberation and for the
problem of security in the border with the four countries.
As
soon as he settled in Kinshasa, Kabila re-distributed concessions
of the different mining sites to different mining companies
to allow him to honour his short term obligations and also
to pay the daily costs of his politico-administrative apparatus.
He courageously renounced to the privatisation of Gecamines
which AMZ had negotiated in April 1997 with the new ADFL
Congolese authorities.
He
also revised all the contracts signed with the American-Canadian
consortium AMZ. Instead he signed an agreement with AMZ
and Anglo American Corporation of South Africa under which
the two companies would form a joint venture to put the
Kipushi and Kolwezi tailings copper and cobalt deposits
into production in partnership with Gecamines. In 1999,
a new management team was appointed and Belgium's Union
Minière, the world's largest refiner of cobalt and
zinc, acquired 11% interest in the joint venture with the
option to increase this investment to 20%.
But
Kabila was unaware of the stakes in the hands of his new
masters and their objectives: to invade the country, balkanise
and partition it into antagonistic micro-states and plunder
its riches. And so by revising all these contracts, by refusing
to pay all the IMF loans Mobutu has contracted, by refusing
to be dictated over by Bechtel and US Aid, Kabila thus signed
not only his own fate but that of his country as well. The
rest is history. On August 2, 1998, The Rwandese wing of
the ADFL rebelled against Kabila, and as a result, Congo
was, once again, solicited from either of the two classic
poles: in the east, the rebels who are masterminded by Rwanda,
Uganda and Burundi, with superpowers and multinational mining
companies as major funds providers in addition to the plundering
of Congo's natural and mineral resources which is also sustaining
the aggression; and in the west, the government side officially
assisted by three countries, including Zimbabwe, Angola
and Namibia. Note that every time the aggressors announced
the capture of a major Congolese locality, the Western media
hurried to state precisely its economic importance.
The
aggressors and their backers expected to swiftly eliminate
Kabila, underestimating his start. But finally they got
him. President Kabila was assassinated on 17th January this
year - the same day Lumumba was massacred and this is not
mere coincidence. Kabila's death was orchestrated by a foreign
hand and executed by 'an African hand', including his own
entourage. Several of Kabila's former close aides, including
Colonel Eddy Kapend and General Yav, have become the known
fall guys.
"Americans
were so irritated by Kabila's nationalism", in the
words of Colette Braeckman, journalist with the Belgian
daily, Le Soir, and expert on Congo and the Great Lakes
Region issues.
Joseph
Kabila who succeeded to his father faces pretty much the
same challenges. His priority of priorities, he says, is
to make sure that Rwandan, Ugandan and Burundians troops
withdraw from Congo. Then an inter-Congolese dialogue followed
by general elections will take place. But Joseph Kabila
has pursued a peaceful resolution of the conflict as stipulated
by the Lusaka accord despite its numerous biases against
Congo's national sovereignty and territorial integrity,
thus presenting the international community and multilateral
agencies, including the IMF, the World Bank, the UN and
the OAU with a challenge to take action swiftly given the
stakes involved the war and the aggression which the Congolese
people - 2.300.000 of whom have been massacred by the invading
troops - are victims.
Soon
after he came to power Joseph Kabila announced the 'liberalisation'
of the economy - to the satisfaction of the IMF, the World
Bank and multinational mining companies - and the removal
of certain exchange control, creating a new incentive for
foreign investment, particularly from Europe and America.
Two
multinational mining giants are particularly upbeat about
what they call 'a new atmosphere of heightened optimism
surrounding the political development in the Democratic
Republic of Congo'.
Firstly
AMZ which recently announced that it has just scooped a
new contract with the new government of the Democratic Republic
of Congo worth $300 million for Kolwezi cooper-cobalt tailings
project in the southern rich in minerals Katanga province,
and which it calls 'potentially the largest direct investment
in the war-torn central African country.
It
soon will enter into a framework agreement with Gecamines
to evaluate the Kipushi zinc/copper mine, and says it has
won a tender to develop the Kolwezi copper/copper tailings
deposits in partnership with Zincor of South Africa.
Secondly,
the Tenke Mining Corporation based in Vancouver, British
Columbia is due to start work at the Tenke Fungurume, the
company's world class copper/cobalt project in the Democratic
Republic of Congo. The Tenke Fungurume concessions are located
in Katanga province in the southernmost part of the country.
The concessions host large, high-grade copper/cobalt deposits
that are world renowned and considered as one of the largest
and richest underdeveloped copper/cobalt deposits. Tenke
Mining Corporation has initiated meetings with Gecamines
to discuss plans for the proposed development of Tenke Fungurume.
"KABILA
WAS NOT THE MAN TO DO BUSINESS WITH"
On
the 2 August 1998, Rwanda, Uganda, and Burundi launched
a war of aggression against the Democratic Republic of Congo
with the blessing of Washington, London and South Africa,
on the pretext that Laurent DésiréKabila whom
they supported to chase long-term kleptocratic dictator
Mobutu Sese Seko from power, was not doing enough to curb
rebel activities from the Congolese territory into Rwanda,
Uganda and Burundi and worse he was not allowing them a
free reign in the Congo to track down and massacre all Hutus
present in the Congo. A UN Panel of Experts on the Illegal
Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth
of Congo, has proved that the reasons advanced by the aggressors
as an alibi. This invasion provides a smoke screen for and
is closely linked to another invasion of Congo' mining properties
at the heart of which are American and Canadian mining companies
and the Openheimer family-run South Africa-based Anglo American
Corporation. These mining companies represent forward beachheads
for the London-centred Club of the Isles, an Anglo-American
global raw materials cartel.
The
opening shot of what is commonly known in business circle
as the 'Second Great Scramble' for Congo's strategic mineral
grab, took place in 1996 when under Mobutu regime, Banro
Corp. of Toronto bought 36% of Société Minière
et Industrièlle du Kivu (Sominki). Sominki was formed
in 1976 as an amalgamation of nine companies that had been
operating in Kivu, the second richest in minerals Congolese
province after Katanga, since 1900s. It operates 47 mining
concessions, encompassing an area of 10,271 square kilometres.
Banro raised some of its money for the purchase by floating
shares in Singapore. Banro was previously a small financial
institution, with little apparent aptitude for mining. It
was reconfigured as a company for the special purpose of
this purchase, or acting as a front for someone.
Another
large chunk of Sominki was bought by the then Belgian-based
mining company Mines d'Or du Zaire (MDDZ). Now 60% of MDDZ's
shares were owned by Cluff Mining CO. of London whose 65%
of shares are controlled by Anglo-American Corp., the world's
largest mining company and a key component of the Club of
the Isles. On September 1996, Banro and MDDZ announced their
merger, with Banro selling its shares to MDDZ. The new Banro-MDDZ
company consolidated a 72% stake in Sominki, while Mobutu's
government held 28%. The Banro-MDDZ entity subsequently
announced that it planned to acquire that 28% from the government,
the last nail in the coffin for Sominki.
In
1997, Kabila took advantage of the geopolitical change in
the region, whereby Rwanda vowed to root out the Interahamwe
(= those who kill together), perpetrators of the 1994 genocide,
harboured by Mobutu in the east of the former Zaire, to
ensure its stability. Uganda and Angola were equally concerned,
given the fact that Mobutu also harboured Angolan UNITA
rebels who had important bases in the south western part
of the former Zaire; Ugandan Lord's Liberation Army rebel
movement was also operating from the north eastern part
of the former Zaire and posed a constant threat to President
Museveni's regime.
Congo's
neighbours decided to do away with Mobutu and readied their
military and logistic support to Mobutu's arch-foe: Laurent
Désiré Kabila.
But
in reality Banro was anxious to get its mining operations
started as quickly as possible. However, the Sominki mining
zone that Banro acquired started in the town of Bukavu,
the centre for the major camp of Rwandan refugees who had
fled to the former Zaire, with nearly a million people.
To get mining started, the entire zone would require clearing.
Suddenly in mid-October 1996, firing started on the Bukavu
refugee camp, supposedly against 'Hutu rebels' who were
hiding there. The military attack on the camp forced hundreds
of thousands of refugees to flee Kivu province, back to
Rwanda.
But
who did the firing? While a clear answer was not forthcoming,
it may have involved portions of the newly acquired Sominki
apparatus itself. For, in acquiring Sominki, Banro did not
just acquire a company; it acquired the effcetive governmental
structure of the entire Kivu province.
A
Banro Corporate press release said at the time: 'Sominki
owns an extensive infrastructure which includes repair shops,
machine shops, electrical shops and large fleet of Land
Rover vehicles. In addition, it operates six hydroelectric
sites, a number of airstrips, and 1,000 kilometres of Roads.
Sominki is virtually self-sufficient.' This self-sufficiency
covered security matters. As a mining company, Sominki had
its own explosive supplies and access to weapons, that is
it had the capability to carry out such an attack, or was
in a commanding position to influence Rwandans and Ugandans
to fire on the refugee camps.
In
1996 Barrick Gold joined hand with Hollinger Corp, and purchased
the 'Mines d'Or de Kilomoto' a huge gold concession in Congo's
northeast Oriental province, which covers 83,000 square
kilometres. Already in May 1995, the Canada-based Barrick
Gold Corp. created an international advisory board around
the personal leadership of former American President George
Bush, then designated as 'honorary senior adviser'.
Also
during 1996, the tiny Vancouver-based raw material company,
Consolidated Eurocan, headed by international wheeler-dealer
Adolf Lundin, began work on exploiting the Tenke-Fungurume
copper-cobalt mines in Congo's southern Katanga province,
near the border with Zambia, which has the richest cobalt
reserves in the world. Cobalt is a strategic metal, crucial
in forming alloys with steel, and other metals, giving them
great strength and heat resistance. Some 40% of cobalt's
use is in aircraft gas turbine engines, and 10% is in magnetic
alloys. Consolidated Eurocan in joint-venture with Anglo-American,
set to purchase the mining property in phases, for a quarter
of a billion American dollars, which is joke for a property
that could yield many tens of billions of dollars in revenues.
At
the same time, American Mineral Fields (AMF), now trading
under the initials AMZ (American Mineral Zincor, since it
is in joint-venture with Zincor of South Africa), had acquired
from Gecamines, Congo's state mining company, the Kipushi
copper-zinc mine, one of the world's premier copper-zinc
mines, located in Katanga province (copper and zinc are
often mined together). The Belgians developped Kipushi and
began mining in 1925. At its peak in 1988, the Kipushi mine
produced 143,000 tons of zinc, and 43,000 tons of copper.
Its total known and probable reserves stand at 22.6 million
tons, grading 2.1% copper and 13.8% zinc. AMZ is the brainchild
of its owner, Jean-Raymond Boulle, a former execuitve for
De Beers's Diamonds. In turn, AMZ signed an agreement with
Anglo-American, which would allow Anglo to invest up to
$100 million in any AMZ venture in Katanga province, representing
up to a 50% equity stake in the venture, including the Kipushi
mine.
After seven months of a swift war, Kabila's 47,000 men helped
by Rwandans and Ugandans made it to Kinshasa on 17 May 1997
and chased Mobutu from power. Right after the fall of Kisamgani.
Congo's third largest city which symbolises Lumumba's struggle
for independence, Kabila auto-proclaimed himself the new
President of the Democratic Republic of Congo, thus short-circuiting
the ambitions of those who helped him win power. Kigali
and Kampala wanted to put in Kinshasa someone malleable
they could totally remote control and so draw massive political,
military and economic dividends in the process. This ambition
did not materialise.
As
soon as Kabila settled in Kinshasa, and started to articulate
clearly the aspirations of his people and summoning them
to take their own destiny into their own hands, politically
and economically, this was perceived by his sponsors as
a covert declaration of independence. Kabila's nationalist
stance immediately clashed with their interests, as he eventually
reviewed all the contracts he had signed with American and
South African mineral companies under Mobutu (and when he
was a rebel?) and re-nationalised all the mines. De Beers
subsequently pulled out of Congo in 1999. Earlier on he
had enlisted the support of Zimbabwe to enlarge his circle
of friends, should he fall out with the first ones. During
the third summit of Comesa (common market community of central
and southern African countries) held in Kinshasa on 29 June
1998, Kabila clearly tabled out what role Congo would play
within the common market and in Africa as a whole.
He
explained that 'more than 40 years of African independence
have offered to the world a sad spectacle of a continent
looted and humiliated with the complicity of its own sons
and daughters'. He expressed the wish 'to see Africa entering
the 21st century totally independent of foreign interference'
and declared that the battle for Congo's independence and
sovereignty is fought in the interest of Africa as a whole.
'Our
country,' he said, 'has a vocation of exporting peace, development
and security to the rest of Africa. A weak Congo means a
vulnerable Africa from its centre, an Africa without a heart.'
The stakes were then raised! Even President Thabo Mbeki
was prompted to say: 'The more time goes, the more we will
loose control of Kabila.' The rest is history. Shortly after
President Kabila's assassination, Colette Braeckman of Le
Soir, a Belgian daily, wrote: 'The people of Congo have
no illusion as to who killed Kabila. They know that his
death was conspired by Western agents put off by Kabila's
nationalist stance and anxious of loosing their interests
but executed by an African and Congolese hand.'
There
is now discussion of opening up the major Congolese government-owned
diamond mining company, Société Minière
de Bakwanga (MIBA), to foreign investors. President Joseph
Kabila has ended a unilateral monopoly of exploitation granted
to IDI, an Israeli mining company granted by his father,
the late President Laurent Désiré Kabila.
MIBA accounts for 40% of the Democratic Republic of Congo's
official diamond exports. The remaining 60% are developed
by artisanal miners, that is, prospectors, who then sell
the gems exclusively to Israeli diamond buyers and to international
gem dealer Maurice Tempelsman, a former president of US
Africa Society, a group that is influential in the shaping
of US government Africa policy.
PROFITS
FOR THE WEST, SLAVERY FOR THE REST
Tempelsman
is no stranger in Congo, according to Janine Farrell Roberts,
an American Human Rights activist and author of 'Blood Stained
Diamonds'. In April 2002, she made a presentation at a roundtable
discussion organised by Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-Georgia),
at the Rayburn House Office Building to discuss American
foreign policy toward Africa, in which she said: 'Maurice
Templesman, a private American citizen and businessman,
served the De Beers diamond cartel by promoting foreign
policy decisions that favoured its access to and control
of African diamond fields. This led to the US covertly supporting
undemocratic and corrupt regimes in Africa to the great
detriment of the African people.'
Roberts
further revealed that when Lumumba, Congo's first elected
leader spoke of using Congo's resources to benefit the Congo,
De Beers feared it would lose access to the one third of
world's diamond supply in the Congo - as would also Tempelsman.
Shortly after this, the CIA facilitated Lumumba's assassination.
Evidence on this came before the Church Intelligence Commission.
Immediately after Lumumba's death, the Acting Prime Minister
of Congo, Adoula announced support for a very major Tempelsman
diamond deal, telegramming this to President Kennedy. The
historian Richard Mahoney claimed that the Adoula regime
was receiving funds from Tempelsman. A State Department
memo headed 'Congo Diamond Deal' stated 'The State Department
has concluded that it is in the political interest of the
US to implement this proposal.' (2 August 1961).
Immediately
after Mobutu came to power, Tempelsman became an even bigger
player in Congo - recruiting his own staff from those CIA
staffers that Mobutu most favoured that put him to power.
Mobutu also at this time gave Tempelsman, as a 'Christmas
Gift', rich mineral reserves.
According
to Tempelsman's staff interviewed, they had a wonderful
time running the Congo - to secure funding for Mobutu. He
succeeded in persuading the White House to secretly buy
a vast number of diamonds for the US startegic reserve -
at a time when Adminstration officials were protesting that
the reserve was over full. The reason for this deal given
in secret US government memos was to support Mobutu and
his partner Adoula. This Tempelsman plan made much profit
for him and De Beers.
A
State Department Cable of 23 December 1964 warned about
the need of secrecy over this Mobutu diamond and South African
uranium deal because 'it could outrage the moderate Africans
we are trying to calm down.' It suggest South Africa Foreign
Minister Muller would understand the need for secrecy since
the US was 'doing a job' in the Congo that South Africa
could not do. This covert support for Mobutu gave the US
a gross excess in the strategic diamond stockpile that was
still being sold off in 1997.
In
1967 the State Department reported: 'Tempelsman is playing
an increasingly central role as Democratic Republic of Congo's
technical advisor and mediator.' But these deals and other
deals done throughout the following decades with a corrupt
Mobutu government left the Congolese people in absolute
poverty.
THE
ITURI BONANZA
Several
western corporations now eye an eventual bonanza in the
Ituri province, where Rwanda and Uganda fomented ethnic
clashes has caused the death of more than 50,000 people.
Many of these corporations are conveniently linked to the
international arms trade and mercenary outfits. Barrick
Gold
Barrick
Gold is a long-time stakeholder in Ituri's Kilo Moto gold
mines. A Canadian-based multinational, Barrick's principals
include former prime minister Brian Mulroney, former US
president George HW Bush, former Tennessee senator Howard
Baker, and Vernon Jordan, Bill Clinton's lawyer and confidant.
Barrick has multiple joint ventures with the South African
mining giant Anglo-American. Barrick's founder is Adnan
Khashoggi, a Saudi billionaire arms trafficker, famous for
his illegal weapons sales to Iran in the Reagan era.
In
1997 Canadian-based Heritage Oil & Gas began petroleum
explorations with the support of the Museveni government
on the Uganda side of the border, and Belgium's De Standard
reports they have now also secured DRC concessions through
Joseph Kabila. Uganda's New Vision newspaper reports sizeable
petroleum and natural gas reserves discovered in the Semiliki
Basin, beneath Lake Albert which straddles the DRC-Uganda
border.
Heritage
Oil & Gas was founded by Tony Buckingham, an executive
linked to a confusing network of front companies and offshore
island holdings. De Standard reported June 19, 2003, on
Heritage Oil's maneuvers in DRC and Uganda, and its links
to companies like Branch Energy and Diamond Works, both
exposed for operations in war-torn Angola and Sierra Leone.
Buckingham is a veteran of the UK's elite SAS military corps,
and played a founding role in the private military companies
Executive Outcomes of South Africa and Sandline International.
De Standard suggested that Buckingham seeks the pacification
of Ituri to exploit minerals in the region.
Buckingham's
ties to US government officials are detailed in Wayne Madsen's
book Genocide And Covert Operations in Africa, 1993-1999
(Edwin Mellen Press, 1999). The mercenary soldier Simon
Mann arrested this March with a posse of followers in Zimbabwe
(allegedly en route to institute a coup in Equatorial Guinea)
is a co-founder with Buckingham of Executive Outcomes.
"The
situation in Ituri remains unstable," wrote Survivor's
Rights International on June 6, "with recurring acts
of genocide and crimes against humanity being perpetrated
by miscellaneous forces on their opposition ethnic groups,
many of which have been armed, supported and manipulated
by the Ugandan People's Defense Forces. The indigenous Mbuti
pygmies continue to suffer the brunt of abuses, including
acts of rape and cannibalism from all sides."
On
July 9, Nairobi's East African Standard reported that hundreds
of refugees fleeing fresh fighting in Ituri had crossed
into Uganda.
JOSEPH
KABILA, SIGNS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE?
The
IMF and World Bank favoured Kabila's transitional government
with loans worth $ 1.2 billion in June 2002, while Sweden,
Belgium, France and South Africa loaned some $522 million.
In January, 2004, the Belgian government authorized the
dispatch of 190 military advisers to Congo to train a new
Congolese military brigade in Orientale.
South
Africa and DRC recently signed a bilateral agreement on
defense and security. DRC also signed a $ 8.4 million deal
with South Africa to rehabilitate the state mining company
GECAMINES.
Chairman
of GECAMINES from 1999-2001, Belgium's George Forrest controls
the most diverse private mining portfolio in the DRC. One
of his partners in DRC is the OM Group of Cleveland, Ohio.
Forrest's
roots in DRC predate 1945, and his companies outlasted the
long Mobutu dictatorship and subsequent wars. Forrest also
owns Belgium's New Lachaussée company, a leading
manufacturer of cartridge casings, grenades, light weapons
and cannon launchers. His George Forest Group also has munitions
plants in Kenya and Tanzania.
Forrest's
mining interests include copper, cobalt and germanium concessions
in Katanga, DRC's southern province, long the site of separatist
movements.
Katanga's
plight also revolves around factions seeking to maintain
or wrest control of resources. Katanga is rich in diamonds,
cobalt, copper, palladium and germanium. Uranium from Katanga
was used in the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Cobalt
is a strategic alloy used in the aerospace and defense industries,
and was stockpiled by the US Defense Logistics Agency during
the Cold War. Maintaining Katanga's "cobalt connection"
was paramount to the Mobutu dictatorship. Keeping the region
safe for Mobutu's cobalt empire was long the purview of
Lawrence Devlin, a CIA operative in Shaba later employed
by diamond magnate Maurice Tempelsman.
Falling
within the Kinshasa government's sphere of control, Katanga
has seen its share of repression and warfare. The Kabila
family is from Katanga, and Kinshasa maintained control
the region in the recent years of war with the aid of troops
from the allied Zimbabwe Defense Forces (ZDF). The ZDF has
officially pulled out of DRC, but unconfirmed reports suggest
some ZDF troops remain.
"An
elite network of Congolese and Zimbabwean political, military
and commercial interests has maintained a grip on the main
mineral resources of government-controlled areas,"
concluded the UN Panel of Experts in 2002.
The
UN reported this network had transferred ownership of at
least $5 billion in assets from the state mining sector
to private companies from 1999-2002 with no benefit to the
DRC. "The network's representatives in the Kinshasa
Government and the Zimbabwe Defense Forces (ZDF) have fueled
instability, by supporting armed groups opposing Rwanda
and Burundi," the UN report found.
A
few notable businessmen said to be calling the shots in
Katanga are American Maurice Tempelsman, Zimbabwean Billy
Rautenbach, South African Marc Rich, British John Bredenkamp,
Swede Adolph Lundin and Jean Raymond Boulle.
Tenke
Mining, owned by Swedish mining magnate Lundin is one of
some 15 multinational mining companies partnered with GECAMINES
in Katanga. Lundin is called a longtime associate of George
HW Bush; African Confidential reported in 1997 that the
ex-president telephoned Mobutu on Lundin's behalf after
the dictator had threatened to terminate a mining contract.
Pardoned
by outgoing President Clinton for tax-evasion charges, Marc
Rich operates the Swiss-based Glencore company.
Operating there are Rautenbach, a former GECAMINES director,
and Bredenkamp. The Bredenkamp family's Brecon Mines Ltd.
is partnered with GECAMINES. Africa Confidential and independent
newspapers in Zimbabwe have reported on Bredenkamp's role
in shipping weapons to Zimbabwe for probable use in the
Congo.
Tempelsman
is affiliated with the Oppenheimer/DeBeers diamond conglomerate
of South Africa. The executive privileges he enjoyed during
the Clinton years were reportedly secured through a romantic
interlude with Madeleine Albright. Tempelsman accompanied
Clinton on his 1998 Africa tour, sailed with the Clintons
off Martha's Vineyard, and met with Clinton on Air Force
One. He is said to employ CIA veterans who protected the
Mobutu dictatorship as his private staff for his Congo operations.
Tempelsman is a trustee of the Harvard AIDS Institute and
Africa-America Institute, and former chair of the Corporate
Council on Africa.
The
Corporate Council on Africa represents 85% of all US private-sector
investment in Africa. Members include Asea Brown Baveri
(whose former director is Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld),
Halliburton (Cheney), the Washington Post Company, Raytheon,
Military Professional Resources Inc., and oil majors such
as ExxonMobil, Chevron-Texaco, Conoco-Philips, Sunoco and
Shell.
According
to Wayne Madsen, the Virginia mercenary firm Military Professional
Resources Inc. (MPRI) supported Kagame's US-backed invasions
of Rwanda (from Uganda in 1994), Zaire (1996) and then Congo
(1998).
The
Africa-America Institute (AAI), another industry interest
group, recently presented the AAI African National Achievement
Award for 2002-3 to President Museveni of Uganda for "history-making
advances that justify optimism for the future of the African
continent."
AAI
trustee Gayle Smith in 1998 was appointed special assistant
to President Clinton and senior director for African Affairs
at the National Security Council, a position where she negotiated
a cease-fire between Uganda and Rwanda, after the ex-allies
battled for the spoils in DRC.
USA
SUPPORTING TERROR
On
March 9, 2004, Le Monde published a report by French anti-terrorist
judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere, who found that Paul Kagame,
then commanding the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), a Tutsi-led
guerilla group operating with the support of Museveni's
Uganda, gave orders for missiles to be fired at the airplane
carrying the Rwandan and Burundian presidents, both ethnic
Hutu, on April 6, 1994. The assassinations provoked the
Hutu-led genocide in Rwanda--which left up to 800,000 dead,
overwhelmingly Tutsis. In the wake of the genocide, the
RPF took power, and hundreds of thousands of Hutu fled Rwanda
for Congo (then Zaire).
Critics
now say Kagame is cynically using the 1994 genocide to deflect
scrutiny of his own war crimes. Human rights organizations
have documented RPF atrocities, with perhaps hundreds of
thousands of killings from 1990 to 1996. In 1994, UN Special
Rapporteur Robert Gersony documented "an unmistakable
pattern of RPF killings" of Hutu refugees returning
to Rwanda: the report was quickly buried. Amnesty International
and other rights groups documented killings of hundreds
of thousands of Rwandan refugees (mostly Hutu) in DRC by
the UPDF/RPF-led insurgency.
Wayne
Madsen reports that Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown
& Root set up a military base in southwestern Rwanda
in 1995 in preparation for the US-backed invasion of Congo/Zaire
to topple the abandoned Mobutu dictatorship.
Amnesty
International in 2002 reported US Defense Intelligence Agency
(DIA) and Special Forces' involvement in the 1996 invasion
of Congo/Zaire. The report said that DIA assisted Rwandan
and Ugandan forces through a program code-named "Falcon
Gorilla." In 1997, the DIA held a Pentagon symposium
on privatization of African security operations with Executive
Outcomes, Sandline International and mineral interests.
Madsen
also maintains that Carla del Ponte, special prosecutor
for the International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda (ICTR)
was removed due to her unwanted scrutiny of RPF atrocities.
In 1997 and 1998, when UN investigators turned their eyes
on the RPF, the US, through then-Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright, pressured the ICTR to halt the investigation,
Madsen claims. Kagame blasted efforts to investigate RPF
atrocities as "evidence of the politicization of the
tribunal's functions."
The
Pentagon maintains International Military Education and
Training (IMET), Joint Combined Exchange Training (JCET),
Africa Crises Response Initiative (ACRI), and African Contingency
Operations Training Assistance (ACOTA) programs with both
Rwanda and Uganda. The Washington Post's Lynne Duke's reported
August 16, 1997, that the RPF benefited from counterinsurgency
and combat training from US Special Forces. The Falcon Gorilla
operation in support of the Rwanda-Uganda intervention in
DRC reportedly came under the purview of JCET.
Gen.
Charles Wald, head of US operations in Africa (under the
Pentagon's European Command), has substantiated direct US
support for the Museveni government's fight against the
Sudan-backed Uganda rebel group Lord's Resistance Army (LRA),
defined as a terrorist organization by the US. The LRA are
a brutal and fanatical group, but critics in the Ugandan
opposition charge Museveni exploits their terror for propaganda
purposes--and that some atrocities attributed to the LRA
were carried out by UPDF troops.
US
Ambassador to Uganda Jimmy Kolker told Voice of America
April 2 2004 that US aid has consisted mainly of trucks
and radios, along with training. He said its total value
was some two million dollars. He dismissed reports of greater
US military assistance as "grotesquely exaggerated."
But
it is clear that the US has tilted to Uganda and Rwanda
in Africa's ongoing First World War. Rwanda's Paul Kagame
spoke at least twice at the Carr Center for Human Rights
at Harvard University, and has met with George HW Bush at
the James Baker Institute for Public Policy in Houston,
and at the Council on Foreign Relations. Kagame was a guest,
with Joseph Kabila, at a Washington prayer breakfast soon
after George W Bush assumed office. Ugandan's Museveni was
a guest speaker at the Center for Strategic and International
Studies (CSIS) in Washington DC on June 11, 2004.
Rwanda
and Uganda continue to be rewarded with World Bank and IMF
loans, despite accusations that funds are diverted to purchase
military equipment and prosecute war in their own and neighboring
countries. One recent Rwanda grant was a $20 million aid
package of June 15, 2004. The UK government has given up
to 60 million pounds a year in "development aid"
to Rwanda and Uganda.
And
US military involvement in the region is about to deepen.
Preceding his trip to Africa in July 2003, President Bush
announced a $100 million aid package for east African countries
to fight terrorism, pointing to greater US strategic interest
in the region. "We will work with Kenya and Ethiopia
and Djibouti and Uganda and Tanzania to improve capabilities...
We will give them the tools and the resources to win the
War on Terror."
LET THEM APPLY THEIR OWN RULES
An Oxford-based British NGO, RAID (Rights & Accountability
in Development) in March 2004 published a report titled:
"Unanswered questions: companies, conflict and the
Democratic Republic of Congo", in which it said that
OECD Governments have Failed to Investigate Corporate Role
in Congo War.
In
October 2002, an Expert Panel set up by the U.N. Security
Council accused 85
companies of violating the OECD Guidelines for Multinational
Enterprises - a voluntary company code that has an obligatory
government monitoring mechanism. To date there has been
almost no progress in investigating these companies. The
furore created by the Panel's reports makes the need to
draw a clear line between acceptable and unacceptable corporate
behaviour a top priority - not just in the tragic case of
the DRC but in all conflict zones," said RAID director,
Patricia Feeney.
But
in October 2003 the Panel's final report failed to make
this distinction clearly. It listed many company cases in
a 'resolved' category without publicly explaining its reasoning
for doing so. Only eleven cases were forwarded on to governments
for investigation under the Guidelines, but so far almost
no action has been taken. Many unanswered questions remain
about the allegations against companies. It's been five
months since the UN Panel of Experts completed its work.
Over the past four years no fewer than five resolutions
or statements have been passed by the UN Security Council
urging governments to conduct their own investigations into
the part played by companies in illegal resource exploitation,
which helped fuel the conflict.
"So
far, most governments have been long on excuses but short
on action" said
Patricia Feeney.
The
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is emerging from a devastating
five-year war that is estimated to have cost the lives of
more than five million people. Multinational corporations
have been accused of helping to perpetuate the war and of
profiteering from it.
In
February 2002, the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, promised
to clamp
down on companies that fuel resource wars in Africa and
called for stricter adherence to the OECD Guidelines as
a means of ensuring that companies behave responsibly in
conflict zones. But now the British government has ruled
out any investigation on the role some British multinationals
and Banks played in the looting of Congo's wealth.
The
report by Rights and Accountability in Development (RAID)
examines the role of companies in the DRC conflict, their
reactions to being listed by the UN Panel and the publicly
unanswered questions that remain about their conduct. For
the first time it frames the questions in relation to the
OECD Guidelines. Governments adhering to the Guidelines
have a responsibility to ensure that they are applied. It
is in nobody's interest - neither that of responsible companies,
nor that of the people of the DRC - to leave these questions
unresolved. This report should act as a catalyst for action
by
governments.
"RAID
is not making allegations of its own nor does it claim that
the UN's allegations amount to proof of misconduct."
But
the Panel's reports raise legitimate, ethical questions,
which, in the interest of all parties concerned, must be
resolved publicly and unambiguously. The DRC case is a crucial
test case.
TYPES
OF ALLEGED MISCONDUCT
1.
Companies who benefited from the direct assistance of the
combatants, such as those trading in minerals, which were,
mined using forced labour or those whose assets were protected
by soldiers or militia.
2.
Companies supplying arms to the rebels or participating
in military actions.
3.
Companies engaged in the smuggling of diamonds to supply
international markets. Money laundering, and illegal currency
transactions.
4.
Companies buying minerals from former foreign or rebel-controlled
areas without conducting due diligence tests as to where
the minerals came from or who was profiting from the trade.
5.
Companies indirectly involved in the trade in resources
from former foreign army and rebel-controlled areas of the
Democratic Republic of Congo.
6.
Companies offering inducements or exercising anti-competitive
influence at a time of great instability to secure lucrative
concessions or contracts
7.
Companies profiting from lucrative joint ventures, mainly
in government controlled areas, set up to exploit Congo's
natural resources with little or no benefit going to the
Congolese people.
8.
Banks failing to exercise due diligence when providing facilities
for companies engaged in misconduct.
Groups File Complaint with State Department Against Three
American Companies Named in UN Report for their Complicity
in Fueling Civil War in Democratic Republic of the Congo
Friend
of the Earth-United States (FoE) and the UK-based group
Rights and Accountability in Development (RAID) filed a
formal complaint with the U.S. State Department today against
three American companies. In October 2002, a United Nations
(UN) Panel of Experts accused the companies of helping to
fuel the war in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).
The
Panel named Cabot Corporation, Eagle Wings Resources International
and OM Group, Inc. as having violated the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD) "Guidelines
for Multinational Enterprises," a set of international
standards for responsible corporate behavior.
FoE
and RAID filed an official complaint today because the State
Department, which has oversight for determining whether
U.S. companies have breached the OECD Guidelines, has declined
to undertake an independent investigation into whether these
companies might have contributed to the war in the DRC.
"If
the State Department refuses to conduct an independent investigation,
a troubling message will be sent to U.S. companies. They'll
know that they can get away with helping to finance violent
conflict and human rights abuses without any repercussions,"
said Colleen Freeman, policy analyst with Friends of the
Earth.
"We
ought to know whether American companies contributed to
one of Africa's deadliest wars so it doesn't happen again."
The
Panel's three-year investigation found that sophisticated
"elite networks" of high-level political, military
and businesspersons, in collaboration with various rebel
groups, intentionally fueled the conflict in order to retain
control over the country's vast natural resources. The Panel
implicated many Western companies for directly or indirectly
helping to fuel the war.
In
its final, October 2003 report, the Panel said that no further
investigation was required into the activities of Cabot,
Eagle Wings and OM Group. But the Panel did make clear that
"resolution should not be
seen as invalidating the Panel's earlier findings with regard
to the activities of these actors."
"Now
that a formal complaint has been submitted, the U.S. government,
as a signatory to the OECD Guidelines, is obligated to examine
whether breaches have occurred," said Patricia Feeney,
director of RAID.
"Clearly
there are many unanswered questions that the State Department
must examine. The conduct of the U.S. companies has to be
measured against internationally agreed standards in a transparent
process - not behind closed doors."
Boston-based
Cabot Corporation allegedly purchased coltan from the DRC
during the war. While Cabot has denied these allegations,
a report by the Belgian Senate states that Eagle Wings Resources
International had a long-term contract to supply Cabot with
coltan. Current Deputy Director of the Department of Treasury,
Samuel Bodman, was CEO and Chairman of Cabot from 1997-2001.
Trinitech
Holdings is the holding company for Ohio-based companies,
Eagle Wings Resources LLC and Trinitech International, Inc.
Eagle Wings Resources International (EWRI) is a joint venture
between Dutch company, Chemie Pharmacie Holland BV (CPH)
and Trinitech Holdings. The Panel asserts that EWRI received
privileged access to coltan sites and captive labour because
of its close ties to the Rwandan military. The Panel has
accused the Rwandan regime of mass-scale looting, systemic
exploitation, and the organization of an elite network centrally
located in the Rwandan Defense Department, set up specifically
to exploit the DRC's natural resources.
Ohio-based
OM Group's joint venture with a Belgian national, George
Forrest, Groupement pour le Traitement des Scories du Terril
de Lumbumbashi, Ltd. (GTL) is accused by the Panel of deliberately
ignoring technical agreements that provide for the construction
of two electrical refineries and a converter for germanium
processing in the DRC from the "Big Hill" project.
Instead, semi-processed ore from the mine was shipped to
OM Group's processing facility in Finland, thereby robbing
the state mining company, Gécamines, of millions
of dollars in revenue. At issue is whether the complex corporate
structure was intended to deny Gécamines the benefits
of the future sales of minerals with significant commercial
potential at a time when the country was at war and there
was no functioning government or mining ministry to protect
the interests of Gécamines and by extension, the
Congolese people.
Separate
to the Panel's allegations concerning the Big Hill project,
a recently released World Bank environmental report raised
concerns about the exploitation of radioactive minerals
from concessions owned by Gécamines, such as the
Shinkolobwe uranium mine. There is evidence that Société
pour le Traitement des Scories du Terril de Lubumbashi (STL)
- a company created by GTL in 1997 - processed radioactive
minerals to obtain cobalt at the company's plant in Lubumbashi,
which is situated close to a hospital. The Belgian Senate
concluded that airborne and waterborne pollution could not
be discounted. At issue is whether the measures in place
at OM Group's plant in Lubumbashi were sufficient to prevent
radioactive contamination of the Congolese workforce and
whether the local population was exposed to unacceptably
high risk of pollution from the operations of the plant.
"It
has been nine months since the United Nations published
the Panel's final report and so far the only serious attempt
to respond to the Panel's allegations has been made by Belgian
judges investigating money laundering and illicit arms transactions
linked to the trade in coltan and diamonds by Belgian companies
and banks. In South Africa, the courts have also started
to uncover assets held in the names of senior Congolese
political figures as a result of breach of contract lawsuits
brought by businessmen against the DRC Government,"
said Feeney.
|